Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. William Pinkus, 72-1069 (1972)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 72-1069 Visitors: 1
Filed: Oct. 16, 1972
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 466 F.2d 1405 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William PINKUS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 72-1069. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Oct. 16, 1972. Robert C. Bonner, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Eric A. Nobles, Asst. U.S. Atty., William D. Keller, U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant. Bernard A. Berkman (argued), Larry S. Gordon, Niki Z. Schwartz, of Berkman, Gordon, Kancelbaum & Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio, Jeremiah Casselman, Beverly Hills, Cal., for de
More

466 F.2d 1405

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William PINKUS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 72-1069.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 16, 1972.

Robert C. Bonner, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Eric A. Nobles, Asst. U.S. Atty., William D. Keller, U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Bernard A. Berkman (argued), Larry S. Gordon, Niki Z. Schwartz, of Berkman, Gordon, Kancelbaum & Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio, Jeremiah Casselman, Beverly Hills, Cal., for defendant- appellee.

Before MERRILL and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges, and TAYLOR, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM:

1

Under the compulsion of United States v. Weller, 466 F.2d 886, (CA9. 1972), we hold that we have no jurisdiction and that the appeal must be dismissed.

2

It is so ordered.

*

The Honorable Fred M. Taylor, Senior District Judge for the District of Idaho, sitting by designation

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer