Filed: May 23, 1972
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 459 F.2d 1389 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Phillip Lee PETERSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 72-1091. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 23, 1972. Charles Robinowitz, Portland, Or., for defendant-appellant. Sidney I. Lezak, U. S. Atty., Jack C. Wong, Asst. U. S. Atty., Portland, Or., for plaintiff-appellee. Before CHAMBERS, ELY, and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 The appellant, convicted of bank robbery and sentenced under the Youth Corrections Act, ap
Summary: 459 F.2d 1389 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Phillip Lee PETERSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 72-1091. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 23, 1972. Charles Robinowitz, Portland, Or., for defendant-appellant. Sidney I. Lezak, U. S. Atty., Jack C. Wong, Asst. U. S. Atty., Portland, Or., for plaintiff-appellee. Before CHAMBERS, ELY, and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 The appellant, convicted of bank robbery and sentenced under the Youth Corrections Act, app..
More
459 F.2d 1389
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Phillip Lee PETERSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 72-1091.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
May 23, 1972.
Charles Robinowitz, Portland, Or., for defendant-appellant.
Sidney I. Lezak, U. S. Atty., Jack C. Wong, Asst. U. S. Atty., Portland, Or., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, ELY, and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
The appellant, convicted of bank robbery and sentenced under the Youth Corrections Act, appeals. Neither of his two contentions are meritorious.
2
The District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying a requested continuance and, since the prosecution produced testimony that Peterson participated in a conversation in which the robbery was planned, the evidence was sufficient to support the judgment of conviction.
