Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Raymond M. Hamilton v. Walter E. Craven, Warden, (Two Cases), 71-2737 (1973)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 71-2737 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 29, 1973
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 469 F.2d 1394 Raymond M. HAMILTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Walter E. CRAVEN, Warden, Defendant-Appellant (two cases). Nos. 71-2737, 71-2844. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Dec. 21, 1972. Rehearing Denied Jan. 29, 1973. Sanford Svetcov, Deputy Atty. Gen. (argued), W. Eric Collins, Deputy Atty. Gen., Doris H. Maier, Asst. Atty. Gen., Herbert L. Ashby, Chief Asst. Atty. Gen., Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant. Emil Roy Eisenhardt (argued), Le
More

469 F.2d 1394

Raymond M. HAMILTON, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Walter E. CRAVEN, Warden, Defendant-Appellant (two cases).

Nos. 71-2737, 71-2844.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 21, 1972.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 29, 1973.

Sanford Svetcov, Deputy Atty. Gen. (argued), W. Eric Collins, Deputy Atty. Gen., Doris H. Maier, Asst. Atty. Gen., Herbert L. Ashby, Chief Asst. Atty. Gen., Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Emil Roy Eisenhardt (argued), Lee Van Boven, of Farella, Braun & Martel, San Francisco, Cal., Michael E. Smith, Berkeley, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before WRIGHT, KILKENNY and CHOY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the district judge. Hamilton v. Craven, 350 F. Supp. 1251 (N.D.Cal.1971). We do not reach other issues raised by appellant or by appellee on the cross-appeal.

2

Judgment affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer