Filed: Feb. 12, 1973
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 472 F.2d 1380 Virgil Leroy AIKINS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 72-1982. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Feb. 12, 1973. ORDER Before ELY and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and CRARY, * District Judge. PER CURIAM: 1 The place of appellant's arrest is immaterial. The cause is remanded to the district court for the purpose of conducting an evidentiary hearing limited to the issue: Was the offense to which appellant pleaded guilty committed within the territorial
Summary: 472 F.2d 1380 Virgil Leroy AIKINS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 72-1982. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Feb. 12, 1973. ORDER Before ELY and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and CRARY, * District Judge. PER CURIAM: 1 The place of appellant's arrest is immaterial. The cause is remanded to the district court for the purpose of conducting an evidentiary hearing limited to the issue: Was the offense to which appellant pleaded guilty committed within the territorial ..
More
472 F.2d 1380
Virgil Leroy AIKINS, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 72-1982.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 12, 1973.
ORDER
Before ELY and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and CRARY, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
1
The place of appellant's arrest is immaterial. The cause is remanded to the district court for the purpose of conducting an evidentiary hearing limited to the issue: Was the offense to which appellant pleaded guilty committed within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States?
2
The district court shall appoint counsel to represent the appellant in said hearing.
