Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Anthony Nicholas Carrion, 73-1171 (1973)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 73-1171 Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 09, 1973
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 475 F.2d 770 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony Nicholas CARRION, Defendant-Appellant. No. 73-1171. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 9, 1973. Victor Sherman, Beverly Hills, Cal., pro se. Jan Lawrence Handzlik, Asst. U. S. Atty., for William D. Keller, U. S. Atty. ORDER ASSESSING PENALTY Before CHAMBERS and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and EAST, * District Judge. PER CURIAM: 1 For failure to prosecute the appeal with due diligence, Victor Sherman, counsel for
More

475 F.2d 770

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Anthony Nicholas CARRION, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 73-1171.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

March 9, 1973.

Victor Sherman, Beverly Hills, Cal., pro se.

Jan Lawrence Handzlik, Asst. U. S. Atty., for William D. Keller, U. S. Atty.

ORDER ASSESSING PENALTY

Before CHAMBERS and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and EAST,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

For failure to prosecute the appeal with due diligence, Victor Sherman, counsel for appellant, is assessed a penalty of Two Hundred Dollars under Rule 46(c), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The sum is to be paid into the registry of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Central District of California within 14 days from the date of this order.

*

The Honorable William G. East, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer