Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Freeman Jesse Arnold, in Re I. A. Kanarek, 73-3101 (1973)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 73-3101 Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 11, 1973
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 487 F.2d 1333 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Freeman Jesse ARNOLD, Defendant-Appellant. In re I. A. KANAREK. No. 73-3101. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Dec. 11, 1973. 1 Sanford H. Monroe, Los Angeles, Cal. (I. A. Kanarek, Van Nuys, Cal., former counsel), for defendant-appellant. 2 William D. Keller, U. S. Atty., Richard Stiltz, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. 3 Before CHAMBERS and BARNES, Circuit Judges, and KING, District Judge. O
More

487 F.2d 1333

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Freeman Jesse ARNOLD, Defendant-Appellant.
In re I. A. KANAREK.

No. 73-3101.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 11, 1973.

1

Sanford H. Monroe, Los Angeles, Cal. (I. A. Kanarek, Van Nuys, Cal., former counsel), for defendant-appellant.

2

William D. Keller, U. S. Atty., Richard Stiltz, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

3

Before CHAMBERS and BARNES, Circuit Judges, and KING, District Judge.

ORDER ASSESSING PENALTY

4

For failure to prosecute the appeal of Freeman Jesse Arnold with due diligence, I. A. KANAREK is assessed a penalty of Two Hundred Dollars under Rule 46(c) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

5

The said sum is to be paid into the registry of the United States District Court for the Central District of California within 14 days from the date of the filing of this order.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer