Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Reid Smith v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the Interior of the United States of America, 72-1799 (1974)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 72-1799 Visitors: 1
Filed: Feb. 01, 1974
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 489 F.2d 1275 Reid SMITH, Appellant, v. Rogers C. B. MORTON, Secretary of the Interior of the United States of America, Appellee. No. 72-1799. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Feb. 1, 1974. William W. Stevenson, Stevenson, Warden & Smith, Flagstaff, Ariz., Gray, Horton & Hill, Reno, Nev., for appellant. William C. Smitherman, U.S. Atty., Phoenix, Ariz., John D. Helm, Kent Frizzell, Asst. Attys. Gen., Carl Strass and Dennis M. O'Connell, Attys. & Lands Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, W
More

489 F.2d 1275

Reid SMITH, Appellant,
v.
Rogers C. B. MORTON, Secretary of the Interior of the United
States of America, Appellee.

No. 72-1799.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 1, 1974.

William W. Stevenson, Stevenson, Warden & Smith, Flagstaff, Ariz., Gray, Horton & Hill, Reno, Nev., for appellant.

William C. Smitherman, U.S. Atty., Phoenix, Ariz., John D. Helm, Kent Frizzell, Asst. Attys. Gen., Carl Strass and Dennis M. O'Connell, Attys. & Lands Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before WRIGHT, KILKENNY and WALLACE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

The decision of the district court is affirmed for the reasons stated in United States v. Reid Smith, sub nom., United States v. Denison, 71 I.D. 144 (1974). See also Barrows v. Hickel 447 F.2d 80, 83 (C.A.9 1971).

2

The consolidation of appellant's hearing with others did not affect his substantial rights.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer