Filed: May 31, 1974
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 493 F.2d 1355 ALPHA DISTRIBUTING COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JACK DANIEL DISTILLERY et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 72-2776. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 12, 1974, Rehearing Denied May 31, 1974. J. Albert Hutchison, San Francisco, Cal. (argued), for plaintiff-appellant. Arthur B. Dunne, San Francisco, Cal. (argued), for defendants-appellees. Before CHAMBERS, MOORE, 1 and ELY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 The court previously remanded the case t
Summary: 493 F.2d 1355 ALPHA DISTRIBUTING COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JACK DANIEL DISTILLERY et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 72-2776. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 12, 1974, Rehearing Denied May 31, 1974. J. Albert Hutchison, San Francisco, Cal. (argued), for plaintiff-appellant. Arthur B. Dunne, San Francisco, Cal. (argued), for defendants-appellees. Before CHAMBERS, MOORE, 1 and ELY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 The court previously remanded the case to..
More
493 F.2d 1355
ALPHA DISTRIBUTING COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
JACK DANIEL DISTILLERY et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 72-2776.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
April 12, 1974, Rehearing Denied May 31, 1974.
J. Albert Hutchison, San Francisco, Cal. (argued), for plaintiff-appellant.
Arthur B. Dunne, San Francisco, Cal. (argued), for defendants-appellees.
Before CHAMBERS, MOORE, and ELY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
The court previously remanded the case to make findings on specific issues. See Alpha Distributing Company of California, Inc., v. Jack Daniel Distillery, Lem Motlow Prop., Inc., 9 Cir., 454 F.2d 442 (1972).
2
No further evidence was offered.
3
While it is a matter of opinion, it is our opinion that the district court did make the findings directed to be made.
4
Finding no error, we affirm.
