Filed: Aug. 25, 1975
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 522 F.2d 621 90 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2747 , 77 Lab.Cas. P 11,094 KING ARTHUR TOYOTA, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 74-2241. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Aug. 25, 1975. James A. Carter, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Jay E. Shanklin, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for respondent. ORDER 1 Before MERRILL and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, * District Judge. 2 The order of the Board issued June 28, 1974, and reported at 212 N.L.R.B. No
Summary: 522 F.2d 621 90 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2747 , 77 Lab.Cas. P 11,094 KING ARTHUR TOYOTA, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 74-2241. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Aug. 25, 1975. James A. Carter, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Jay E. Shanklin, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for respondent. ORDER 1 Before MERRILL and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, * District Judge. 2 The order of the Board issued June 28, 1974, and reported at 212 N.L.R.B. No...
More
522 F.2d 621
90 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2747, 77 Lab.Cas. P 11,094
KING ARTHUR TOYOTA, INC., Petitioner,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.
No. 74-2241.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 25, 1975.
James A. Carter, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.
Jay E. Shanklin, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for respondent.
ORDER
1
Before MERRILL and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, District Judge.
2
The order of the Board issued June 28, 1974, and reported at 212 N.L.R.B. No. 42, is enforced in full.
