Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Humboldt Fir, Inc., 77-3594 (1980)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 77-3594 Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 12, 1980
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 625 F.2d 330 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HUMBOLDT FIR, INC., Defendant-Appellant. No. 77-3594. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 12, 1980. 1 Robert E. Phelan, Rothschild, Phelan & Montali, San Francisco, Cal., argued, for defendant-appellant. 2 Nancy B. Firestone, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appellee. ORDER 3 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. 4 Before BROWNING and KILKENNY, C
More

625 F.2d 330

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
HUMBOLDT FIR, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 77-3594.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 12, 1980.

1

Robert E. Phelan, Rothschild, Phelan & Montali, San Francisco, Cal., argued, for defendant-appellant.

2

Nancy B. Firestone, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appellee.

ORDER

3

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

4

Before BROWNING and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges, and EAST,* Senior District Judge.

5

We affirm on the grounds set forth in the opinion of the district court. See In re Humboldt Fir, Inc., 426 F. Supp. 292 (N.D. Cal. 1977).

*

Honorable William G. East, Senior Judge, United States District Court, District of Oregon, sitting by designation

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer