Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

David L. Narver, Jr. And Margaret B. Narver v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 81-7037 (1982)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 81-7037 Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 03, 1982
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 670 F.2d 855 82-1 USTC P 9265 David L. NARVER, Jr. and Margaret B. Narver, et al., Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. No. 81-7037. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 2, 1982. Decided March 3, 1982. William M. Schindler, Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, San Diego, Cal., for petitioners-appellants. Robert S. Pomerance, Washington, D. C., argued for respondent-appellee; John F. Murray, Michael L. Paup, M. Carr Fe
More

670 F.2d 855

82-1 USTC P 9265

David L. NARVER, Jr. and Margaret B. Narver, et al.,
Petitioners-Appellants,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 81-7037.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Feb. 2, 1982.
Decided March 3, 1982.

William M. Schindler, Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, San Diego, Cal., for petitioners-appellants.

Robert S. Pomerance, Washington, D. C., argued for respondent-appellee; John F. Murray, Michael L. Paup, M. Carr Ferguson, Richard Farber, Stephen J. Gray, Washington, D. C., on brief.

Before ELY, HUG and ALARCON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The well reasoned opinion of the Tax Court is reported in Narver v. Commissioner, 75 T.C. 53 (1980). The facts are clearly set forth in that opinion, and we affirm essentially for the reasons set forth in that opinion.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer