Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Los Angeles Branch Naacp v. Los Angeles Unified School District, 81-5772 (1984)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 81-5772 Visitors: 2
Filed: Feb. 16, 1984
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 725 F.2d 1257 LOS ANGELES BRANCH NAACP, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 81-5772. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Feb. 16, 1984. G. William Shea, Peter W. James, McCutchen, Black, Verleger & Shea, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees. Thomas I. Atkins, Gen. Counsel, Brooklyn, N.Y., for defendants-appellants. (Opinion Sept. 1, 1983, 9 Cir., 1983, 714 F.2d 935 ) Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN
More

725 F.2d 1257

LOS ANGELES BRANCH NAACP, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 81-5772.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 16, 1984.

G. William Shea, Peter W. James, McCutchen, Black, Verleger & Shea, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Thomas I. Atkins, Gen. Counsel, Brooklyn, N.Y., for defendants-appellants.

(Opinion Sept. 1, 1983, 9 Cir., 1983, 714 F.2d 935)

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

1

Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer