Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

82-3111 (1984)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 82-3111 Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 28, 1984
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 729 F.2d 613 Frank HAYGOOD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Evelle J. YOUNGER, etc., Defendants, and Harold Cranke and Benjamin Seymour, Defendants-Appellants. L.R. BRETZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Zollie KELMAN, Jack R. Lande, Eugene R. Welborn, Donald Zeman, James Cook and the City of Great Falls, Montana, a municipal corporation, Defendants-Appellees. James PIATT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ellis MacDOUGALL, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 81-4686, 82-3111 and 82-5328. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circui
More

729 F.2d 613

Frank HAYGOOD, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Evelle J. YOUNGER, etc., Defendants, and Harold Cranke and
Benjamin Seymour, Defendants-Appellants.
L.R. BRETZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Zollie KELMAN, Jack R. Lande, Eugene R. Welborn, Donald
Zeman, James Cook and the City of Great Falls,
Montana, a municipal corporation,
Defendants-Appellees.
James PIATT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Ellis MacDOUGALL, Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 81-4686, 82-3111 and 82-5328.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

March 28, 1984.

William George Prahl, Deputy Atty. Gen., Sacramento, Cal., for defendants-appellants in No. 81-4686.

Jack Jacobson, Santa Cruz, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee in No. 81-4686.

L.R. Bretz, Billings, Mont., for plaintiff-appellant in No. 82-3111.

William Conklin, Gregory H. Warner, Graybill, Ostrem, Warner & Crotty, Great Falls, Mont., for defendants-appellees in No. 82-3111.

James Piatt, in pro. per.

Jay R. Adkins, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, Ariz., for defendant-appellee in No. 82-5328.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

1

Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, these cases are consolidated for rehearing by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignments are withdrawn.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer