Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Joseph Benchimol, 81-4689 (1985)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 81-4689 Visitors: 17
Filed: Jul. 19, 1985
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 766 F.2d 416 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph BENCHIMOL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 81-4689. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. July 19, 1985. Joseph Russoniello, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. Scott Russell Barnett, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant. Before WALLACE, HUG and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 Pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court in United States v. Benchimol, - U.S. -, 105 S. Ct. 2103 , 85 L. Ed. 2d 462 (1985), the opi
More

766 F.2d 416

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Joseph BENCHIMOL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 81-4689.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

July 19, 1985.

Joseph Russoniello, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Scott Russell Barnett, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Before WALLACE, HUG and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

Pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court in United States v. Benchimol, --- U.S. ----, 105 S. Ct. 2103, 85 L. Ed. 2d 462 (1985), the opinion of this court reported at 738 F.2d 1001 (9th Cir.1984) is vacated and the order of the district court is

2

AFFIRMED.

3

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer