Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ferris F. Boothe and Dorothy S. Boothe v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 84-7508 (1985)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 84-7508 Visitors: 2
Filed: Aug. 16, 1985
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 768 F.2d 1140 56 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 85-5676 , 85-2 USTC P 9615 Ferris F. BOOTHE and Dorothy S. Boothe, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. No. 84-7508. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 9, 1985. Decided Aug. 16, 1985. Ferris F. Boothe, Boothe & Powers, Portland, Or., for petitioners-appellants. Glenn L. Archer, Jr., Michael L. Paup, Richard Farber, Robert S. Pomerance, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respo
More

768 F.2d 1140

56 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 85-5676, 85-2 USTC P 9615

Ferris F. BOOTHE and Dorothy S. Boothe, Petitioners-Appellants,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 84-7508.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted July 9, 1985.
Decided Aug. 16, 1985.

Ferris F. Boothe, Boothe & Powers, Portland, Or., for petitioners-appellants.

Glenn L. Archer, Jr., Michael L. Paup, Richard Farber, Robert S. Pomerance, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from the decision of the United States Tax Court.

Before BROWNING and ALARCON, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Ferris and Dorothy Boothe appeal the Tax Court's decision, 82 T.C. 804, disallowing a deduction of $20,792.00 as an ordinary loss on their 1977 tax return. Appellants contend that a judgment and court costs of $20,792.00 paid by them in 1977 is deductible as an ordinary loss under 26 U.S.C. Sec. 165(c) as a loss arising from a theft; the Commissioner allowed the deduction only as a long-term capital loss under 26 U.S.C. Sec. 165(f).

2

The unusual facts in this case created sharp differences of opinion in the Tax Court, with ten judges supporting the majority opinion and eight judges supporting two dissenting opinions. We agree with and adopt the dissenting opinion of Judge Korner. The decision of the Tax Court is reversed and the matter is remanded to the Tax Court for disposition consistent with Judge Korner's dissenting opinion.

3

REVERSED and REMANDED.

*

The Honorable Philip C. Wilkins, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of California, sitting by designation

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer