Filed: Feb. 20, 1986
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 782 F.2d 1510 30 Ed. Law Rep. 35 Mary L. KLING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 83-6193. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Feb. 20, 1986. 1 Stanley Fleishman, Marilyn Holle, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant. 2 Joe Ben Hudgens, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees. 3 Prior report: 633 F.2d 876 (9th Cir.1980). 4 Before FLETCHER and CANBY, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, * District Judge. ORDER 5 Kling's counsel's request t
Summary: 782 F.2d 1510 30 Ed. Law Rep. 35 Mary L. KLING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 83-6193. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Feb. 20, 1986. 1 Stanley Fleishman, Marilyn Holle, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant. 2 Joe Ben Hudgens, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees. 3 Prior report: 633 F.2d 876 (9th Cir.1980). 4 Before FLETCHER and CANBY, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, * District Judge. ORDER 5 Kling's counsel's request to..
More
782 F.2d 1510
30 Ed. Law Rep. 35
Mary L. KLING, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 83-6193.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 20, 1986.
1
Stanley Fleishman, Marilyn Holle, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.
2
Joe Ben Hudgens, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees.
4
Before FLETCHER and CANBY, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, District Judge.
ORDER
5
Kling's counsel's request to file a supplemental brief is denied.
6
The within case is remanded to the district court for disposition pursuant to the order of the Supreme Court, --- U.S. ----, 106 S. Ct. 300, 88 L. Ed. 2d 277 (1985) reversing the judgment of this court, 769 F.2d 532 (9th Cir.1985).
