Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bernard Brandchaft, Dr. v. E.F. Hutton & Company, Inc., 87-6528 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 87-6528 Visitors: 2
Filed: Feb. 01, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 841 F.2d 886 Bernard BRANDCHAFT, Dr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E.F. HUTTON & COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 87-6528. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 28, 1988. Decided Feb. 1, 1988. Before TANG, FLETCHER and POOLE, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 On July 2, 1987, this case was removed to federal court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. At the time of removal, the complaint contained allegations against fictitious "Doe" defendants. On September 29, 1987, the distr
More

841 F.2d 886

Bernard BRANDCHAFT, Dr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
E.F. HUTTON & COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 87-6528.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 28, 1988.
Decided Feb. 1, 1988.

Before TANG, FLETCHER and POOLE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

On July 2, 1987, this case was removed to federal court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. At the time of removal, the complaint contained allegations against fictitious "Doe" defendants. On September 29, 1987, the district court struck the "Doe" allegations pursuant to C.D.Cal.R. 3.7.2.1 and dismissed the complaint as to defendant E.F. Hutton & Company, Inc. Plaintiff appealed the district court's order on October 22, 1987.

2

On January 11, 1988, plaintiff moved to remand this case to state court pursuant to Bryant v. Ford Motor Co., 832 F.2d 1080, 1083 n. 6 (9th Cir.1987) (en banc). The motion to remand is denied. Bryant does not require remand in cases where "Doe" defendants were stricken by the district court prior to the November 6, 1987 decision in Bryant.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer