Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

In Re Ann Marie Price, Debtor. Multnomah County District Attorney's Office and Victims Assistance Program v. Ann Marie Price, 89-35482 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 89-35482 Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 23, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 920 F.2d 562 In re Ann Marie PRICE, Debtor. MULTNOMAH COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and Victims Assistance Program, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ann Marie PRICE, Defendant-Appellee. No. 89-35482. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 5, 1990. * Decided Nov. 23, 1990. Douglass E. Beloof, Office of the Dist. Atty., Multnomah County, Portland, Or., for plaintiffs-appellants. Dennis A. Boardman, Boardman & Wong, Portland, Or., for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United S
More

920 F.2d 562

In re Ann Marie PRICE, Debtor.
MULTNOMAH COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and Victims
Assistance Program, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Ann Marie PRICE, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 89-35482.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 5, 1990.*
Decided Nov. 23, 1990.

Douglass E. Beloof, Office of the Dist. Atty., Multnomah County, Portland, Or., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Dennis A. Boardman, Boardman & Wong, Portland, Or., for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon.

Before WRIGHT, CHOY and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

On the authority of Pennsylvania Dept. of Public Welfare v. Davenport, --- U.S. ----, 110 S. Ct. 2126, 109 L. Ed. 2d 588 (1990), we affirm the decision of the district court that a state criminal restitution obligation is dischargeable under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code.

*

The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4 and Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer