Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

In Re Cuyler Wenberg Neta Wenberg, Debtors. Cuyler Wenberg Neta Wenberg v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Acting as Receiver of Valencia Bank, 89-55037 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 89-55037 Visitors: 26
Filed: May 07, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 902 F.2d 768 In re Cuyler WENBERG; Neta Wenberg, Debtors. Cuyler WENBERG; Neta Wenberg, Appellants, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, acting as Receiver of Valencia Bank, Appellee. No. 89-55037. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 11, 1990. Decided May 7, 1990. William M. Burd, Burd and Marshack, Santa Ana, Cal., for appellants. Daniel Z. Zahner, Federal Deposit Ins. Corp., Newport Beach, Cal., for appellee. Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy A
More

902 F.2d 768

In re Cuyler WENBERG; Neta Wenberg, Debtors.
Cuyler WENBERG; Neta Wenberg, Appellants,
v.
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, acting as Receiver of
Valencia Bank, Appellee.

No. 89-55037.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 11, 1990.
Decided May 7, 1990.

William M. Burd, Burd and Marshack, Santa Ana, Cal., for appellants.

Daniel Z. Zahner, Federal Deposit Ins. Corp., Newport Beach, Cal., for appellee.

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel.

Before NELSON, NORRIS and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

This is an appeal from the decision of the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 158(d).

2

On February 4, 1987, appellants Cuyler and Neta Wenberg filed a petition for Chapter 13 bankruptcy in the Central District of California. Prior to that date, the Texas bankruptcy court had entered a judgment in favor of the FDIC and against Mr. Wenberg for damages in an amount to be ascertained and for "all costs and attorney's fees." The California bankruptcy court held that the award of attorney's fees and costs was a liquidated debt for the purpose of determining debtor eligibility under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 109(e). The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirmed. In re Wenberg, 94 B.R. 631 (Bankr. 9th Cir.1988). We AFFIRM for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer