Filed: Nov. 30, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 41 F.3d 502 In re William HALL; Eleanor Hall, Debtors. James RIGBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William HALL; Eleanor Hall, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-35934. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Nov. 30, 1994. Before: SKOPIL, ALARCON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The opinion filed July 29, 1993 and reported at 1 F.3d 853 (1993) is withdrawn. With the opinion vacated, the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc is moot. The parties may file a renewal of the peti
Summary: 41 F.3d 502 In re William HALL; Eleanor Hall, Debtors. James RIGBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William HALL; Eleanor Hall, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-35934. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Nov. 30, 1994. Before: SKOPIL, ALARCON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The opinion filed July 29, 1993 and reported at 1 F.3d 853 (1993) is withdrawn. With the opinion vacated, the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc is moot. The parties may file a renewal of the petit..
More
41 F.3d 502
In re William HALL; Eleanor Hall, Debtors.
James RIGBY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William HALL; Eleanor Hall, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-35934.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Nov. 30, 1994.
Before: SKOPIL, ALARCON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
1
The opinion filed July 29, 1993 and reported at 1 F.3d 853 (1993) is withdrawn. With the opinion vacated, the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc is moot. The parties may file a renewal of the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc upon the filing of a new decision by the court.
