Filed: Jun. 05, 1997
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 116 F.3d 487 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcario Maya MORALES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-50491. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 3, 1997. * Decided June 5, 1997. Appeal from the United St
Summary: 116 F.3d 487 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcario Maya MORALES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-50491. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 3, 1997. * Decided June 5, 1997. Appeal from the United Sta..
More
116 F.3d 487
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Marcario Maya MORALES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 96-50491.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 3, 1997.
Decided June 5, 1997.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, No. CR-95-01796-01-NAJ; Napoleon A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding.
Before: NORRIS, LEAVY, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM
In light of United States v. Fuentes-Barahona, 111 F.3d 651 (9th Cir.1997), we vacate the sentence enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(2) and remand for resentencing.
VACATED and REMANDED.