Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Jose Lombera-Camorlinga, United States of America v. Jose Oropeza-Flores, 98-50347 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 98-50347 Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 01, 1999
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 188 F.3d 1177 (9th Cir. 1999) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOSE LOMBERA-CAMORLINGA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOSE OROPEZA-FLORES, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 98-50347, 98-50305 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Filed October 1, 1999 Before: HUG, Chief Judge. 1 Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Cir
More

188 F.3d 1177 (9th Cir. 1999)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JOSE LOMBERA-CAMORLINGA, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JOSE OROPEZA-FLORES, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 98-50347, 98-50305

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Filed October 1, 1999

Before: HUG, Chief Judge.

1

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three judge panel opinion, United States v. Lombera-Camorlinga, 170F.3d 1241 (9th Cir.1999), and the three judge memorandum decision, United States v. Oropeza-Flores, No. 98-50305, 1999 WL 195621 (9th Cir. Mar. 31, 1999), are withdrawn.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer