Filed: Aug. 02, 2000
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 222 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2000) ADRIAN SALMON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. M. CARILLO; DANIEL E. LUNGREN, Attorney General, Respondent-Appellee. No. 96-55707 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Filed August 2, 2000 D.C. No. CV-95-03554-DT, Central District of California Before: Otto R. Skopil, Jr., Stephen Reinhardt, and Susan P. Graber, Circuit Judges. AMENDED ORDER 1 The order filed June 28, 2000 is amended as follows: In light of the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in R
Summary: 222 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2000) ADRIAN SALMON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. M. CARILLO; DANIEL E. LUNGREN, Attorney General, Respondent-Appellee. No. 96-55707 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Filed August 2, 2000 D.C. No. CV-95-03554-DT, Central District of California Before: Otto R. Skopil, Jr., Stephen Reinhardt, and Susan P. Graber, Circuit Judges. AMENDED ORDER 1 The order filed June 28, 2000 is amended as follows: In light of the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Ro..
More
222 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2000)
ADRIAN SALMON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
M. CARILLO; DANIEL E. LUNGREN, Attorney General, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 96-55707
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Filed August 2, 2000
D.C. No. CV-95-03554-DT, Central District of California
Before: Otto R. Skopil, Jr., Stephen Reinhardt, and Susan P. Graber, Circuit Judges.
AMENDED ORDER
1
The order filed June 28, 2000 is amended as follows: In light of the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 120 S. Ct. 1029 (2000), it is ORDERED that this case be remanded to the district court for an evidentiary hearing on Petitioner's plea-related and appeal-related ineffectiveness of counsel claims. With this amendment, the petition for rehearing is denied.
