Filed: Apr. 24, 2000
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 209 F.3d 1122 (9th Cir. 2000) LUCIO FLORES ORTEGA,Petitioner-Appellant, v. ERNEST C. ROE, Warden,ORDER Respondent-Appellee. No. 97-17232 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT April 24, 2000 On Remand from the United States Supreme Court; D.C. No. CV-95-05612-GEB Before: Robert R. Beezer, Cynthia Holcomb Hall and Pamela Ann Rymer, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 Upon consideration of the opinion of the Supreme Court we vacate our opinion in Ortega v. Roe, 160 F.3d 534 (9th Cir. 1998). This
Summary: 209 F.3d 1122 (9th Cir. 2000) LUCIO FLORES ORTEGA,Petitioner-Appellant, v. ERNEST C. ROE, Warden,ORDER Respondent-Appellee. No. 97-17232 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT April 24, 2000 On Remand from the United States Supreme Court; D.C. No. CV-95-05612-GEB Before: Robert R. Beezer, Cynthia Holcomb Hall and Pamela Ann Rymer, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 Upon consideration of the opinion of the Supreme Court we vacate our opinion in Ortega v. Roe, 160 F.3d 534 (9th Cir. 1998). This ..
More
209 F.3d 1122 (9th Cir. 2000)
LUCIO FLORES ORTEGA,Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
ERNEST C. ROE, Warden,ORDER Respondent-Appellee.
No. 97-17232
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
April 24, 2000
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court; D.C. No. CV-95-05612-GEB
Before: Robert R. Beezer, Cynthia Holcomb Hall and Pamela Ann Rymer, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
1
Upon consideration of the opinion of the Supreme Court we vacate our opinion in Ortega v. Roe, 160 F.3d 534 (9th Cir. 1998). This case is remanded to the district court for proceedings consistent with the opinion in Ernest C. Roe, Warden v. Lucio Flores-Ortega, 120 S. Ct. 1029 (2000).
2
The clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith
