Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

99-15625 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 99-15625 Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 30, 2000
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 234 F.3d 493 (9th Cir. 2000) ASPEN GREEN; NEALE ALLEN; JON MICHAEL; DORITA BRADY; WALLACE L. CRAIG; JUDY LESTER, Residents and Qualified Electors in Tortolita, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF TUCSON, an Arizona municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 99-15625 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Date Filed: 11/30/00 D.C. No. CV-98-00443-TUC/RCC Before: HUG, Chief Judge. ORDER 1 Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered t
More

234 F.3d 493 (9th Cir. 2000)

ASPEN GREEN; NEALE ALLEN; JON MICHAEL; DORITA BRADY; WALLACE L. CRAIG; JUDY LESTER, Residents and Qualified Electors in Tortolita, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF TUCSON, an Arizona municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 99-15625

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date Filed: 11/30/00

D.C. No. CV-98-00443-TUC/RCC

Before: HUG, Chief Judge.

ORDER

1

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer