Filed: Jun. 12, 2001
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 254 F.3d 825 (9th Cir. 2001) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JAMES EARL MATTHEWS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 98-10499 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Filed June 12, 2001 DC No. CR-98-00040-PMP BEFORE: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge. ORDER 1 Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as preceden
Summary: 254 F.3d 825 (9th Cir. 2001) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JAMES EARL MATTHEWS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 98-10499 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Filed June 12, 2001 DC No. CR-98-00040-PMP BEFORE: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge. ORDER 1 Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent..
More
254 F.3d 825 (9th Cir. 2001)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JAMES EARL MATTHEWS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 98-10499
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Filed June 12, 2001
DC No. CR-98-00040-PMP
BEFORE: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.
ORDER
1
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
