Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Richard Craig Kesser v. Steven J. Cambra, Jr., Warden, Jennifer Gayle Leahy v. Teena Farmon, Warden, 02-15475 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 02-15475 Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 14, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: 425 F.3d 1230 Richard Craig KESSER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Steven J. CAMBRA, Jr., Warden, Respondent-Appellee. Jennifer Gayle Leahy, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Teena Farmon, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 02-15475. No. 01-17467. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. October 14, 2005. William Weiner, Esq., San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant. Catherine A. Rivlin, Esq., Michael E. Banister, DAG, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent-Ap
More

425 F.3d 1230

Richard Craig KESSER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Steven J. CAMBRA, Jr., Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Jennifer Gayle Leahy, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Teena Farmon, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-15475.

No. 01-17467.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

October 14, 2005.

William Weiner, Esq., San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Catherine A. Rivlin, Esq., Michael E. Banister, DAG, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Stephen B. Bedrick, Esq., Oakland, CA, for Amicus California Appellate Defense Counsel.

David M. Porter, Esq., Federal Public Defender's Sacramento, CA, for Amicus National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

John T. Philipsborn, Esq., San Francisco, CA, for Amicus California Attorneys for Criminal Justice.

Jennifer Gayle Leahy, Chowchilla, CA, pro se.

Michael E. Banister, DAG, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

ORDER

1

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion in Kesser v. Cambra, No. 02-15475, shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer