Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Raul Ortuno-Higareda, 04-10257 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 04-10257 Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 29, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: 471 F.3d 1360 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raul ORTUNO-HIGAREDA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 04-10257. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. December 29, 2006. Lynnette C. Kimmins, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Evo A. Deconcini U.S. Courthouse, Nathan D. Leonardo, Esq., Leonardo & Roach, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Francisco Leon, Esq., Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant. Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge. ORDER 1 Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular ac
More

471 F.3d 1360

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Raul ORTUNO-HIGAREDA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-10257.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

December 29, 2006.

Lynnette C. Kimmins, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Evo A. Deconcini U.S. Courthouse, Nathan D. Leonardo, Esq., Leonardo & Roach, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Francisco Leon, Esq., Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

ORDER

1

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer