Filed: Mar. 26, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT T. JEFFREY SIMPSON, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, and CALIFORNIA STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM, No. 04-55665 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-01-11115- HOMESTORE.COM, INC.; STUART H. WOLFF; PETER B. TAFEEN; RSWL Central District PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS; AOL of California, TIME WARNER INC.; CENDANT Los Angeles CORPORATION; RICHARD A. SMITH; ORDER L90, aka Max Worldwide; SMARTHOME, IN
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT T. JEFFREY SIMPSON, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, and CALIFORNIA STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM, No. 04-55665 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-01-11115- HOMESTORE.COM, INC.; STUART H. WOLFF; PETER B. TAFEEN; RSWL Central District PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS; AOL of California, TIME WARNER INC.; CENDANT Los Angeles CORPORATION; RICHARD A. SMITH; ORDER L90, aka Max Worldwide; SMARTHOME, INC..
More
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
T. JEFFREY SIMPSON, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly
situated,
Plaintiff,
and
CALIFORNIA STATE TEACHERS
RETIREMENT SYSTEM, No. 04-55665
Plaintiff-Appellant,
D.C. No.
v. CV-01-11115-
HOMESTORE.COM, INC.; STUART H.
WOLFF; PETER B. TAFEEN;
RSWL
Central District
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS; AOL of California,
TIME WARNER INC.; CENDANT Los Angeles
CORPORATION; RICHARD A. SMITH; ORDER
L90, aka Max Worldwide;
SMARTHOME, INC.; DAVID M.
ROSENBLATT; CATHERINE KWONG
GIFFEN; ALLAN P. MERRILL; SOPHIA
LOSH; JEFF KALINA; DAVID
COLBURN; ERIC KELLER,
Defendants-Appellees.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
Filed March 26, 2008
Before: Robert R. Beezer, Thomas G. Nelson, and
Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judges.
3037
3038 CALIFORNIA STATE TEACHERS v. HOMESTORE.COM
ORDER
Pursuant to the judgment of the United States Supreme
Court issued on February 25, 2008 in Avis Budget Group v.
California State Teachers Retirement System,
128 S. Ct. 1119,
169 L. Ed. 2d 945 (2008), we vacate our opinion at
452 F.3d
1040 (9th Cir. 2006), vacate the district court’s decision, and
remand for further proceedings which are consistent with the
opinion of the Supreme Court.
PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2008 Thomson/West.