Richter v. Hickman, 06-15614 (2008)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Number: 06-15614
Visitors: 16
Filed: Nov. 10, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOSHUA RICHTER, Petitioner-Appellant, No. 06-15614 v. D.C. No. CV-01-00643-JKS R. Q. HICKMAN, Warden; CAL A. TERHUNE; ERNIE ROE, ORDER Respondents-Appellees. Filed November 10, 2008 ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any cou
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOSHUA RICHTER, Petitioner-Appellant, No. 06-15614 v. D.C. No. CV-01-00643-JKS R. Q. HICKMAN, Warden; CAL A. TERHUNE; ERNIE ROE, ORDER Respondents-Appellees. Filed November 10, 2008 ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any cour..
More
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOSHUA RICHTER, Petitioner-Appellant, No. 06-15614 v. D.C. No. CV-01-00643-JKS R. Q. HICKMAN, Warden; CAL A. TERHUNE; ERNIE ROE, ORDER Respondents-Appellees. Filed November 10, 2008 ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. Judge Callahan did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case. 15417 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.
Source: CourtListener
