Doody v. Schriro, 06-17161 (2009)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Number: 06-17161
Visitors: 10
Filed: May 12, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOHNATHAN ANDREW DOODY, Petitioner-Appellant, No. 06-17161 v. DORA B. SCHRIRO; MEGAN SAVAGE; D.C. No. CV-98-00528-EHC ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE ORDER STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondents-Appellees. Filed May 12, 2009 ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOHNATHAN ANDREW DOODY, Petitioner-Appellant, No. 06-17161 v. DORA B. SCHRIRO; MEGAN SAVAGE; D.C. No. CV-98-00528-EHC ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE ORDER STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondents-Appellees. Filed May 12, 2009 ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as p..
More
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOHNATHAN ANDREW DOODY, Petitioner-Appellant, No. 06-17161 v. DORA B. SCHRIRO; MEGAN SAVAGE; D.C. No. CV-98-00528-EHC ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE ORDER STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondents-Appellees. Filed May 12, 2009 ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. Judges Hawkins and Silverman did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case. 5901 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.
Source: CourtListener
