Harrison v. Gillespie, 08-16602 (2010)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Number: 08-16602
Visitors: 24
Filed: Jun. 18, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAMES M. HARRISON, No. 08-16602 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:08-cv-00802-RCJ- DOUGLAS GILLESPIE, RJJ Respondent-Appellee. ORDER Filed June 18, 2010 ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. Ju
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAMES M. HARRISON, No. 08-16602 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:08-cv-00802-RCJ- DOUGLAS GILLESPIE, RJJ Respondent-Appellee. ORDER Filed June 18, 2010 ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. Jud..
More
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAMES M. HARRISON, No. 08-16602 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:08-cv-00802-RCJ- DOUGLAS GILLESPIE, RJJ Respondent-Appellee. ORDER Filed June 18, 2010 ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. Judges Rawlinson and Bybee did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case. 9247
Source: CourtListener
