Sessoms v. Runnels, 08-17790 (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Number: 08-17790
Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 15, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TIO DINERO SESSOMS, No. 08-17790 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:05-cv-01221- D. L. RUNNELS, JAM-GGH Respondent-Appellee. ORDER Filed December 15, 2011 ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. 2
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TIO DINERO SESSOMS, No. 08-17790 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:05-cv-01221- D. L. RUNNELS, JAM-GGH Respondent-Appellee. ORDER Filed December 15, 2011 ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. 21..
More
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TIO DINERO SESSOMS, No. 08-17790 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:05-cv-01221- D. L. RUNNELS, JAM-GGH Respondent-Appellee. ORDER Filed December 15, 2011 ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. 21107
Source: CourtListener
