United States v. Ahmed Ressam, 09-30000 (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Number: 09-30000
Visitors: 15
Filed: Aug. 02, 2011
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-30000 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:99-cr-00666- AHMED RESSAM, JCC-1 Defendant-Appellee. ORDER Filed August 2, 2011 ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. 103
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-30000 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:99-cr-00666- AHMED RESSAM, JCC-1 Defendant-Appellee. ORDER Filed August 2, 2011 ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. 1030..
More
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-30000 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:99-cr-00666- AHMED RESSAM, JCC-1 Defendant-Appellee. ORDER Filed August 2, 2011 ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. 10305
Source: CourtListener
