Richard Lee v. Robert Lampert, 09-35276 (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Number: 09-35276
Visitors: 31
Filed: Feb. 08, 2011
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RICHARD R. LEE, No. 09-35276 Petitioner-Appellee, v. D.C. No. 1:02-cv-00300-CL ROBERT O. LAMPERT, ORDER Respondent-Appellant. Filed February 8, 2011 ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. Judge Mu
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RICHARD R. LEE, No. 09-35276 Petitioner-Appellee, v. D.C. No. 1:02-cv-00300-CL ROBERT O. LAMPERT, ORDER Respondent-Appellant. Filed February 8, 2011 ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. Judge Mur..
More
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RICHARD R. LEE, No. 09-35276 Petitioner-Appellee, v. D.C. No. 1:02-cv-00300-CL ROBERT O. LAMPERT, ORDER Respondent-Appellant. Filed February 8, 2011 ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. Judge Murguia did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case. 2329
Source: CourtListener
