Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Arsdi v. Holder, 10-72147 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 10-72147 Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 24, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OCT 24 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS ALAZAR GETACHEW ARSDI, No. 10-72147 Petitioner, Agency No. A028-129-238 v. MEMORANDUM * ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted August 9, 2011 San Francisco, California Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, O’SCANNLAIN and BEA, Circuit Judges. Alazar Getachew Ars
More
                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                         FILED
                            FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT                           OCT 24 2011

                                                                        MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                         U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

ALAZAR GETACHEW ARSDI,                           No. 10-72147

              Petitioner,                        Agency No. A028-129-238

  v.
                                                 MEMORANDUM *
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

              Respondent.



                     On Petition for Review of an Order of the
                         Board of Immigration Appeals

                       Argued and Submitted August 9, 2011
                            San Francisco, California

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, O’SCANNLAIN and BEA, Circuit Judges.

       Alazar Getachew Arsdi is a native and citizen of Ethiopia, who is removable

under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) for having committed an aggravated felony.

He petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of his claim

for deferral of removal pursuant to the United Nations Convention Against Torture




        *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
(“CAT”).1 We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny Arsdi’s

petition.

       “[A]dministrative findings of fact are conclusive unless any reasonable

adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.” 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252(b)(4)(B) (emphasis added). It was Arsdi’s burden to show “a chance

greater than fifty percent that he will be tortured if removed.” Hamoui v. Ashcroft,

389 F.3d 821
, 827 (9th Cir. 2004).

       The record in this case does not compel a conclusion that Arsdi will more

likely than not be tortured. He has produced some evidence that torture sometimes

occurs in Ethiopian prisons. But because he has not even shown that he will more

likely than not be detained if returned to Ethiopia, he clearly has not shown that he

will more likely than not be tortured.

       DENIED.




       1
        Arsdi also filed for asylum and withholding of removal. His appeal
regarding those claims is disposed of in a concurrently filed opinion.

                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer