IN RE MONROY, 650 F.3d 1300 (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Number: infco20110620127
Visitors: 21
Filed: Jun. 20, 2011
Latest Update: Jun. 20, 2011
Summary: ORDER The decisions of the Bankruptcy Courts are affirmed for the reasons given by the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel in its published opinion in In re Herrera, 422 B.R. 698 (9th Cir. BAP 2010), filed January 5, 2010 and attached as an appendix to this order. [Editor's Note: Appendix Omitted for Purposes of Publication] 1 FootNotes * The Honorable Stephen M. McNamee, Senior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Arizona, sitting by designation. 1. The remand issue raised by the a
Summary: ORDER The decisions of the Bankruptcy Courts are affirmed for the reasons given by the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel in its published opinion in In re Herrera, 422 B.R. 698 (9th Cir. BAP 2010), filed January 5, 2010 and attached as an appendix to this order. [Editor's Note: Appendix Omitted for Purposes of Publication] 1 FootNotes * The Honorable Stephen M. McNamee, Senior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Arizona, sitting by designation. 1. The remand issue raised by the ap..
More
ORDER
The decisions of the Bankruptcy Courts are affirmed for the reasons given by the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel in its published opinion in In re Herrera, 422 B.R. 698 (9th Cir. BAP 2010), filed January 5, 2010 and attached as an appendix to this order. [Editor's Note: Appendix Omitted for Purposes of Publication]1
FootNotes
* The Honorable Stephen M. McNamee, Senior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Arizona, sitting by designation.
1. The remand issue raised by the appellants before this court is waived because it was not raised below. In re Cybernetic Servs., Inc., 252 F.3d 1039, 1045 n. 3 (9th Cir.2001).
Source: Leagle
