Richard Stengel v. Medtronic Incorporated, 10-17755 (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Number: 10-17755
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 25, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: FILED FOR PUBLICATION JUL 25 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RICHARD STENGEL; MARY LOU No. 10-17755 STENGEL, D.C. No. 4:10-cv-00318-RCC Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. ORDER MEDTRONIC INCORPORATED, a foreign corporation, Defendant - Appellee. KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3.
Summary: FILED FOR PUBLICATION JUL 25 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RICHARD STENGEL; MARY LOU No. 10-17755 STENGEL, D.C. No. 4:10-cv-00318-RCC Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. ORDER MEDTRONIC INCORPORATED, a foreign corporation, Defendant - Appellee. KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. T..
More
FILED FOR PUBLICATION JUL 25 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RICHARD STENGEL; MARY LOU No. 10-17755 STENGEL, D.C. No. 4:10-cv-00318-RCC Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. ORDER MEDTRONIC INCORPORATED, a foreign corporation, Defendant - Appellee. KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. Judges Wardlaw, Murguia and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote as to whether the case should be taken en banc.
Source: CourtListener
