Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Rufino Valdes-Vega, 10-50249 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 10-50249 Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 25, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: FILED FOR PUBLICATION APR 25 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-50249 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 5:09-cr-00024-VAP-1 v. ORDER RUFINO IGNACIO VALDES-VEGA, Defendant - Appellant. KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The thre
More
FILED FOR PUBLICATION APR 25 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-50249 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 5:09-cr-00024-VAP-1 v. ORDER RUFINO IGNACIO VALDES-VEGA, Defendant - Appellant. KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer