Bauman v. Daimlerchrysler Corp, 07-15386 (2014)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Number: 07-15386
Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 28, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BARBARA BAUMAN; GREGORY No. 07-15386 GRIECO; JOSEFINA NUNEZ; GABRIELE NUNEZ; MIRIAM NUNEZ; D.C. No. SILVIA NUNEZ; EMILIO GUILLERMO CV-04-00194- PESCE; MIRTA HAYDEE ARENAS; RMW GRACIELA GIGENA; GUILLERMO ALBERTO GIGENA, NURIA GIGENA; AMELIA SCHIAFFO; ELBA LEICHNER; ORDER ANUNCIACION SPALTRO DE BELMONTE; HECTOR RATTO; EDUARDO OLASIREGUI; RICARDO MARTIN HOFFMAN; EDUARDO ESTIVILLE; ALFREDO MANUEL MARTIN; JUAN JOSE MARTIN; JOSE BARR
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BARBARA BAUMAN; GREGORY No. 07-15386 GRIECO; JOSEFINA NUNEZ; GABRIELE NUNEZ; MIRIAM NUNEZ; D.C. No. SILVIA NUNEZ; EMILIO GUILLERMO CV-04-00194- PESCE; MIRTA HAYDEE ARENAS; RMW GRACIELA GIGENA; GUILLERMO ALBERTO GIGENA, NURIA GIGENA; AMELIA SCHIAFFO; ELBA LEICHNER; ORDER ANUNCIACION SPALTRO DE BELMONTE; HECTOR RATTO; EDUARDO OLASIREGUI; RICARDO MARTIN HOFFMAN; EDUARDO ESTIVILLE; ALFREDO MANUEL MARTIN; JUAN JOSE MARTIN; JOSE BARRE..
More
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BARBARA BAUMAN; GREGORY No. 07-15386 GRIECO; JOSEFINA NUNEZ; GABRIELE NUNEZ; MIRIAM NUNEZ; D.C. No. SILVIA NUNEZ; EMILIO GUILLERMO CV-04-00194- PESCE; MIRTA HAYDEE ARENAS; RMW GRACIELA GIGENA; GUILLERMO ALBERTO GIGENA, NURIA GIGENA; AMELIA SCHIAFFO; ELBA LEICHNER; ORDER ANUNCIACION SPALTRO DE BELMONTE; HECTOR RATTO; EDUARDO OLASIREGUI; RICARDO MARTIN HOFFMAN; EDUARDO ESTIVILLE; ALFREDO MANUEL MARTIN; JUAN JOSE MARTIN; JOSE BARREIRO; ALEJANDRO DAER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION and DAIMLERCHRYSLER AG, Defendants-Appellees. Filed February 28, 2014 On Remand From The United States Supreme Court 2 BAUMAN V. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORP. Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Dorothy W. Nelson, and Stephen Reinhardt, Circuit Judges. ORDER In accordance with the Supreme Court’s opinion of January 14, 2014, as well as the resulting judgment, the district court’s order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss is AFFIRMED.
Source: CourtListener
