Filed: Apr. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GINA FIORE; KEITH GIPSON, No. 08-17558 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:07-cv-01674- ECR-LRL ANTHONY WALDEN; UNKNOWN AGENTS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, ORDER Defendants-Appellees. On Remand from the United States Supreme Court Filed April 18, 2014 Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, Marsha S. Berzon, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges. ORDER On February 25, 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States issued an opinion reversing thi
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GINA FIORE; KEITH GIPSON, No. 08-17558 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:07-cv-01674- ECR-LRL ANTHONY WALDEN; UNKNOWN AGENTS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, ORDER Defendants-Appellees. On Remand from the United States Supreme Court Filed April 18, 2014 Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, Marsha S. Berzon, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges. ORDER On February 25, 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States issued an opinion reversing this..
More
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GINA FIORE; KEITH GIPSON, No. 08-17558
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
D.C. No.
v. 2:07-cv-01674-
ECR-LRL
ANTHONY WALDEN; UNKNOWN
AGENTS OF THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT, ORDER
Defendants-Appellees.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
Filed April 18, 2014
Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, Marsha S. Berzon, and
Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
On February 25, 2014, the Supreme Court of the United
States issued an opinion reversing this Court, and holding that
the district court lacked personal jurisdiction over defendant
Anthony Walden. See Walden v. Fiore, 134 S. Ct. 1115
(2014). We therefore remand this case to the district court
with instructions to dismiss the complaint for lack of
jurisdiction.
