Filed: Apr. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IN RE: STEPHEN LAW, No. 09-60046 Debtor, BAP No. 09-1077-PaMkH STEPHEN LAW, Appellant, ORDER v. ALFRED H. SIEGEL, Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellee. On Remand from the United States Supreme Court Filed April 23, 2014 Before: Harry Pregerson, Sidney R. Thomas, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges. ORDER Pursuant to the opinion of the Supreme Court in Law v. Siegel, 134 S. Ct. 1188 (2014), we vacate our disposition at 435 F. App’x 697 (
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IN RE: STEPHEN LAW, No. 09-60046 Debtor, BAP No. 09-1077-PaMkH STEPHEN LAW, Appellant, ORDER v. ALFRED H. SIEGEL, Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellee. On Remand from the United States Supreme Court Filed April 23, 2014 Before: Harry Pregerson, Sidney R. Thomas, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges. ORDER Pursuant to the opinion of the Supreme Court in Law v. Siegel, 134 S. Ct. 1188 (2014), we vacate our disposition at 435 F. App’x 697 (9..
More
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
IN RE: STEPHEN LAW, No. 09-60046
Debtor,
BAP No.
09-1077-PaMkH
STEPHEN LAW,
Appellant,
ORDER
v.
ALFRED H. SIEGEL, Chapter 7
Trustee,
Appellee.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
Filed April 23, 2014
Before: Harry Pregerson, Sidney R. Thomas,
and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Pursuant to the opinion of the Supreme Court in Law v.
Siegel, 134 S. Ct. 1188 (2014), we vacate our disposition at
435 F. App’x 697 (9th Cir. 2011), reverse the Bankruptcy
Appellate Panel’s and bankruptcy court’s decisions, and
2 IN RE: LAW
remand to the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel with instructions
to remand to the bankruptcy court for further proceedings
consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.
