Lagoon Rancheria v. State of California, 10-17803 (2014)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Number: 10-17803
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 11, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BIG LAGOON RANCHERIA, a Nos. 10-17803 federally recognized Indian tribe, 10-17878 Plaintiff-Appellee– Cross-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:09-cv-01471-CW v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDER Defendant-Appellant– Cross-Appellee. Filed June 11, 2014 ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BIG LAGOON RANCHERIA, a Nos. 10-17803 federally recognized Indian tribe, 10-17878 Plaintiff-Appellee– Cross-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:09-cv-01471-CW v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDER Defendant-Appellant– Cross-Appellee. Filed June 11, 2014 ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit ..
More
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BIG LAGOON RANCHERIA, a Nos. 10-17803 federally recognized Indian tribe, 10-17878 Plaintiff-Appellee– Cross-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:09-cv-01471-CW v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDER Defendant-Appellant– Cross-Appellee. Filed June 11, 2014 ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. Judges Owens and Friedland did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
Source: CourtListener
