Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

US Ex Rel. Steven Hartpence v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc., 12-55396 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 12-55396 Visitors: 1
Filed: Dec. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES EX REL. STEVEN J. No. 12-55396 HARTPENCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:08-cv-01885- v. GHK-AGR KINETIC CONCEPTS, INC.; KCI-USA, INC., Defendants-Appellees. UNITED STATES EX REL. GERALDINE No. 12-56117 GODECKE, Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:08-cv-06403- v. GHK-AGR KINETIC CONCEPTS, INC.; KCI-USA, INC., ORDER Defendants-Appellees. Filed December 3, 2014 2 U.S. EX REL HARTPENCE V. KINETIC CONCEPTS ORDER THOMAS,
More
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES EX REL. STEVEN J. No. 12-55396 HARTPENCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:08-cv-01885- v. GHK-AGR KINETIC CONCEPTS, INC.; KCI-USA, INC., Defendants-Appellees. UNITED STATES EX REL. GERALDINE No. 12-56117 GODECKE, Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:08-cv-06403- v. GHK-AGR KINETIC CONCEPTS, INC.; KCI-USA, INC., ORDER Defendants-Appellees. Filed December 3, 2014 2 U.S. EX REL HARTPENCE V. KINETIC CONCEPTS ORDER THOMAS, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer