Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Jonathon Castro v. County of Los Angeles, 12-56829 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 12-56829 Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 28, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 28 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS JONATHON MICHAEL CASTRO, No. 12-56829 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:10-cv-05425-DSF v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; LOS ORDER ANGELES SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; CHRISTOPHER SOLOMON; DAVID VALENTINE, Sergeant, aka Valentine, Defendants - Appellants. THOMAS, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pu
More
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 28 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS JONATHON MICHAEL CASTRO, No. 12-56829 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:10-cv-05425-DSF v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; LOS ORDER ANGELES SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; CHRISTOPHER SOLOMON; DAVID VALENTINE, Sergeant, aka Valentine, Defendants - Appellants. THOMAS, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer