Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ENO v. JEWELL, 805 F.3d 1154 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: inadvfco160201000368 Visitors: 19
Filed: Nov. 12, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 12, 2015
Summary: ORDER The opinion filed on August 27, 2015, appearing at 798 F.3d 1245 , is hereby amended. The petition for rehearing is granted in part and the opinion is amended as follows: At slip op. page 11 n. 2 [798 F.3d at 1251], change "We observed as much in a prior appeal involving Eno and charges of unauthorized removal of minerals from these lands." to "We observed as much in a prior appeal, involving unauthorized removal of minerals from these lands, to which Eno was not a party." With this am
More

ORDER

The opinion filed on August 27, 2015, appearing at 798 F.3d 1245, is hereby amended. The petition for rehearing is granted in part and the opinion is amended as follows:

At slip op. page 11 n. 2 [798 F.3d at 1251], change "We observed as much in a prior appeal involving Eno and charges of unauthorized removal of minerals from these lands." to "We observed as much in a prior appeal, involving unauthorized removal of minerals from these lands, to which Eno was not a party."

With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing and rehearing en bane and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en bane are DENIED. No further petitions for en bane or panel rehearing shall be permitted.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer