Filed: Feb. 17, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROBERT DOUGLAS SMITH, Nos. 96-99025 Petitioner-Appellant, 96-99026 10-99011 v. D.C. No. CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, CV-87-00234-CKJ Arizona, Department of District of Arizona, Corrections, Tucson Respondent-Appellee. ORDER Filed February 17, 2016 Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Stephen Reinhardt, and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges. Order 2 SMITH V. RYAN ORDER The opinion filed February 4, 2016 is hereby amended as follows: 1. Sl
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROBERT DOUGLAS SMITH, Nos. 96-99025 Petitioner-Appellant, 96-99026 10-99011 v. D.C. No. CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, CV-87-00234-CKJ Arizona, Department of District of Arizona, Corrections, Tucson Respondent-Appellee. ORDER Filed February 17, 2016 Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Stephen Reinhardt, and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges. Order 2 SMITH V. RYAN ORDER The opinion filed February 4, 2016 is hereby amended as follows: 1. Sli..
More
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROBERT DOUGLAS SMITH, Nos. 96-99025 Petitioner-Appellant, 96-99026 10-99011 v. D.C. No. CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, CV-87-00234-CKJ Arizona, Department of District of Arizona, Corrections, Tucson Respondent-Appellee. ORDER Filed February 17, 2016 Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Stephen Reinhardt, and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges. Order 2 SMITH V. RYAN ORDER The opinion filed February 4, 2016 is hereby amended as follows: 1. Slip Op. at 1: In the heading, replace “DORA B. SCHRIRO” with “CHARLES L. RYAN”. 2. Slip Op. at 1: In the heading, replace “D.C. No. CV-87- 00234-RMB” with “D.C. No. CV-87-00234-CKJ District of Arizona, Tucson”. 3. Slip Op. at 4, lines 4-6: Replace “After that hearing the state trial court denied Smith’s Atkins claim, and the Arizona Court of Appeal and Arizona Supreme Court affirmed.” with “After that hearing, the state trial court denied Smith’s Atkins claim, the Arizona Court of Appeals denied special action relief, and the Arizona Supreme Court denied Smith’s petition for review.”
