United States v. Selso Orona, 17-17508 (2019)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Number: 17-17508
Visitors: 14
Filed: Nov. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 18 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-17508 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. Nos. 2:16-cv-02160-SRB 2:11-cr-00856-SRB-1 v. District of Arizona, Phoenix SELSO RANDY ORONA, ORDER Defendant-Appellee. THOMAS, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 18 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-17508 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. Nos. 2:16-cv-02160-SRB 2:11-cr-00856-SRB-1 v. District of Arizona, Phoenix SELSO RANDY ORONA, ORDER Defendant-Appellee. THOMAS, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and C..
More
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 18 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-17508 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. Nos. 2:16-cv-02160-SRB 2:11-cr-00856-SRB-1 v. District of Arizona, Phoenix SELSO RANDY ORONA, ORDER Defendant-Appellee. THOMAS, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. Judges Murguia and Hunsaker did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
Source: CourtListener
