Filed: Nov. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 26 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SALVADOR MORALES-JASSO, No. 19-70816 Petitioner, Agency No. A030-224-184 v. MEMORANDUM* WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted November 18, 2019** Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. Salvador Morales-Jasso, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for revie
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 26 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SALVADOR MORALES-JASSO, No. 19-70816 Petitioner, Agency No. A030-224-184 v. MEMORANDUM* WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted November 18, 2019** Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. Salvador Morales-Jasso, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review..
More
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 26 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SALVADOR MORALES-JASSO, No. 19-70816
Petitioner, Agency No. A030-224-184
v.
MEMORANDUM*
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 18, 2019**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Salvador Morales-Jasso, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen.
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion.
Najmabadi v. Holder,
597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for
review.
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Morales-Jasso’s untimely
motion to reopen where Morales-Jasso failed to demonstrate changed country
conditions in Mexico to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time limitation.
See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2)-(3); see also
Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 987-90 (new
evidence lacked materiality).
Morales-Jasso’s opposed motion for stay of removal is denied as moot.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
2 19-70816