Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Salvador Morales-Jasso v. William Barr, 19-70816 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 19-70816 Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 26 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SALVADOR MORALES-JASSO, No. 19-70816 Petitioner, Agency No. A030-224-184 v. MEMORANDUM* WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted November 18, 2019** Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. Salvador Morales-Jasso, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for revie
More
                              NOT FOR PUBLICATION                        FILED
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       NOV 26 2019
                                                                      MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                              FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SALVADOR MORALES-JASSO,                         No.    19-70816

                Petitioner,                     Agency No. A030-224-184

 v.
                                                MEMORANDUM*
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

                Respondent.

                     On Petition for Review of an Order of the
                         Board of Immigration Appeals

                          Submitted November 18, 2019**

Before:      CANBY, TASHIMA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

      Salvador Morales-Jasso, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen.

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion.

Najmabadi v. Holder, 
597 F.3d 983
, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for

review.

      *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
      **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
      The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Morales-Jasso’s untimely

motion to reopen where Morales-Jasso failed to demonstrate changed country

conditions in Mexico to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time limitation.

See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2)-(3); see also 
Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 987-90
(new

evidence lacked materiality).

      Morales-Jasso’s opposed motion for stay of removal is denied as moot.

      PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.




                                          2                                   19-70816

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer