Filed: Aug. 24, 2020
Latest Update: Aug. 24, 2020
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 24 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ESVIN OCTAVIO BONILLA BARRIOS, No. 15-70229 Petitioner, Agency No. A206-912-674 v. MEMORANDUM* WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted August 20, 2020** Before: SCHROEDER, TROTT, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges. Esvin Octavio Bonilla Barrios, a native and citizen of Guatemala, p
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 24 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ESVIN OCTAVIO BONILLA BARRIOS, No. 15-70229 Petitioner, Agency No. A206-912-674 v. MEMORANDUM* WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted August 20, 2020** Before: SCHROEDER, TROTT, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges. Esvin Octavio Bonilla Barrios, a native and citizen of Guatemala, pe..
More
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 24 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ESVIN OCTAVIO BONILLA BARRIOS, No. 15-70229 Petitioner, Agency No. A206-912-674 v. MEMORANDUM* WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted August 20, 2020** Before: SCHROEDER, TROTT, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges. Esvin Octavio Bonilla Barrios, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order affirming the decision of an asylum officer during expedited removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review. We lack jurisdiction to review the removal order because it was issued pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1) and none of the exceptions to the restriction on judicial review of expedited removal orders apply. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(A)(iii) (“[N]o court shall have jurisdiction to review” determinations made under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1)(B)); Pena v. Lynch, 815 F.3d 452, 455-56 (9th Cir. 2016) (concluding that this court generally lacks jurisdiction to review removal orders issued pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1) and describing the limited exceptions). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. 2 15-70229